We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy with the information contained on this site, or the information linked to over the state site. Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can deliver inaccuracies. You should read the full case before depending on it for legal research purposes.
The police has the power to arrest a person even without obtaining a warrant of arrest from a court. The an abundance of this power casts an obligation on the police and it must bear in mind, as held by this Court that if a person is arrested for your crime, his constitutional and fundamental rights must not be violated. Read more
When the DIGP finds evidence of a cognizable offense by either party, he shall direct the relevant SHO to record statements and proceed according on the legislation. This petition stands disposed of in the above terms. Read more
We make no warranties or guarantees about the precision, completeness, or adequacy in the information contained on this site, or the information linked to to the state site. Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before counting on it for legal research purposes.
thirteen . Const. P. 209/2025 (S.B.) Saifullah Jamali (Disable) V/S Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi After arguing the matter at some duration, both parties have agreed towards the disposal of the moment petition on the premise that the DIGP Malir will hear the petitioner and also private respondents and will choose care of each of the aspects of the case and assure that no harassment shall be caused to both the parties.
However it can be made clear that police is free to get action against any person that is indulged in criminal activities subject to legislation. However no harassment shall be caused into the petitioner, if she acts within the bonds of law. Police shall also assure respect on the family lose in accordance with law and whenever they have reasonable ground to prevent the congnizable offence they can act, so far as raiding the house is concerned the police shall protected concrete evidence and obtain necessary permission from the concerned high police official/Magistrate like a issue of security with the house is concerned, which just isn't public place under the Act 1977. nine. Considering the aforementioned details, the objective of filing this petition is realized. Consequently, this petition is hereby disposed of inside the terms stated earlier mentioned. Read more
Apart from the rules of procedure for precedent, the weight specified to any reported judgment may well count on the reputation of both the reporter and also the judges.[7]
We have been an independent branch of government constitutionally entrusted with the fair and just resolution of disputes in order to preserve the rule of legislation and to protect the rights and liberties guaranteed from the Constitution and laws in the United States and this State.
On June 16, 1999, a lawsuit was filed on behalf on the boy by a guardian ad litem, against DCFS, the social worker, and also the therapist. A similar lawsuit was also filed on behalf with the Roe’s victimized son by a different guardian ad litem. The defendants petitioned the trial court for the dismissal based on absolute immunity, because they were all acting in their Work opportunities with DCFS.
139 . Const. P. 288/2024 (D.B.) Engro Fertilizers Limited through Asad Shakil Khan website V/S Full Bench of NIRC & others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur Pertaining to the second issue of non-service of grievance notice. Under Section 33 from the Industrial Relations Ac1,2012 (lRA 2012), ifa grievance notice is not really served, the grievance petition might be dismissed. This is because service of the grievance notice is often a mandatory need and a precondition for filing a grievance petition. The law needs that a grievance notice be served over the employer before filing a grievance petition. This allows the employer to answer the grievance and attempt to resolve it amicably. In case the employer fails to reply or resolve the grievance, the employee can then file a grievance petition with the National Industrial Relations Commission CNIRC) Should the organization is transprovincial.
Federalism also plays a major role in determining the authority of case law in a very particular court. Indeed, Every circuit has its individual list of binding case regulation. Consequently, a judgment rendered in the Ninth Circuit will not be binding while in the Second Circuit but will have persuasive authority.
If granted absolute immunity, the parties would not only be protected from liability inside the matter, but could not be answerable in any way for their actions. When the court delayed making this type of ruling, the defendants took their request for the appellate court.
171 . Const. P. 1832/2019 (D.B.) Muhammad Fakhar ul Hasnain V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi It's perfectly proven now that the provision for proforma promotion isn't alien or unfamiliar to the civil servant service composition however it is already embedded in Fundamental Rule 17, wherein it's lucidly enumerated that the appointing authority may if glad that a civil servant who was entitled to become promoted from a particular date was, for no fault of his possess, wrongfully prevented from rendering service to the Federation/ province from the higher post, direct that such civil servant shall be paid the arrears of pay back and allowances of such higher post through proforma promotion or upgradation arising from the antedated fixation of his/her seniority. Read more
Criminal cases During the common legislation tradition, courts decide the legislation applicable to some case by interpreting statutes and implementing precedents which record how and why prior cases have been decided. In contrast to most civil legislation systems, common law systems Adhere to the doctrine of stare decisis, by which most courts are bound by their individual previous decisions in similar cases. According to stare decisis, all reduced courts should make decisions consistent with the previous decisions of higher courts.